On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:44:33 +1200 Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Urman wrote: > > The fact that > > round returns a float rather than an int, while intentional, does not > > feature prominently in one's mine when the first version yielded the > > expected results. > > As an aside, does anyone else think that it would be > useful to have a builtin which rounds and converts to > an int in one go? Whenever I use round(), I almost > always want the result as an int, and making me do > it in two steps seems unnecessarily bothersome. It's not even clear to me that int(round(x)) is always the nearest integer to x. Is it always true that float(some_int)>=some_int ? (for positive values). (ie. I am wondering if truncating the float representation of an int always gives back the original int). Simon. -- Simon Burton, B.Sc. Licensed PO Box 8066 ANU Canberra 2601 Australia Ph. 61 2 6249 6940 http://arrowtheory.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
