Nick Coghlan wrote: > > > One possibility would be to invert the sense of that flag and call it > "typeerror", which probably more accurately reflects what it's intended for - > it's a way of telling the function "if this object does not have the correct > type, tell me by setting this flag instead of by setting the Python error > state".
+1 on changing the name (type_error might be a better spelling) -Travis _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
