On 9/16/06, Talin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nick Coghlan wrote: > > As for the reason: it makes it possible to use the same style for classes > > without bases as is used for functions without arguments. Prior to this > > change, there was a sharp break in the class syntax, such that if you got > > rid > > of the last base class you had to get rid of the parentheses as well. > > Is the result a new-style or classic-style class? It would be nice if > using the empty parens forced a new-style class...
That was my first thought as well. Unfortunately a quick test shows that class Foo(): creates an old style class instead :( -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro "The universe is always one step beyond logic." _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
