Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to propose that the AST format returned by passing PyCF_ONLY_AST to > compile() get the same guarantee in maintenance branches as the bytecode > format - that is, unless it's absolutely necessary, we'll keep it the same. > Otherwise anyone trying to write tools to manipulate the AST is in for a > massive world of hurt. > > Anyone have any problems with this, or can it be added to PEP 6?
Sounds like a good idea. Cheers, mwh -- Reading Slashdot can [...] often be worse than useless, especially to young and budding programmers: it can give you exactly the wrong idea about the technical issues it raises. -- http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/klee/misc/slashdot.html#reasons _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
