Gregory P. Smith wrote:
>>I've never liked the "".join([]) idiom for string concatenation; in my
>>opinion it violates the principles "Beautiful is better than ugly." and
>>"There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.".
>>(And perhaps several others.) To that end I've submitted patch #1569040
>>to SourceForge:
>>
>>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1569040&group_id=5470&atid=305470
>>This patch speeds up using + for string concatenation.
>
>
> yay! i'm glad to see this. i hate the "".join syntax. i still write
> that as string.join() [...]
instance.method(*args) <==> type.method(instance, *args)
You can nowadays spell this as str.join("", lst) - no need to import a
whole module!
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com
Skype: holdenweb http://holdenweb.blogspot.com
Recent Ramblings http://del.icio.us/steve.holden
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
