Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Greg Ewing schrieb: > >> Might we want to add an in-place version of the 3-arg >> pow() function one day? > > What could the syntax for that be?
It wouldn't be a syntax, just a function, e.g. ipow(x, n, 10) > Also, it would break existing __ipow__ implementations > that only receive two arguments You could consider them broken already, since the signature clearly implies that there could be a third argument. The fact that it's not currently used is no excuse. :-) -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com