Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Greg Ewing schrieb: > > the end result would be too > > convoluted for ordinary people to understand and maintain. > > That very much depends on what the end result would be.
True. What I should have said is that Guido *believes* the outcome would be too convoluted. Christian's original Stackless implementation certainly was, and to my knowledge nobody has ever suggested a way to do better. If someone could come up with a plan for a stackless interpreter that was just as straightforward as the existing one, that would be worth considering. But I won't be holding my breath. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
