Greg> I actually came up with an idea for that, slightly too late to get Greg> considered in the original lockstep-iteration debate:
Greg> for (x in seq1, y in seq2): Greg> ... That's already valid syntax though. Skip _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com