Greg> I actually came up with an idea for that, slightly too late to get
Greg> considered in the original lockstep-iteration debate:
Greg> for (x in seq1, y in seq2):
Greg> ...
That's already valid syntax though.
Skip
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
