[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I really, really wish that every feature proposal for Python had
to meet
> > > some burden of proof
Ben North wrote:
> > This is what I understood the initial posting to python-ideas to be
> > about.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm suggesting that the standards of the community in _evaluating_ to
> the proposals should be clearer
Perhaps I didn't need to take your initial comments personally then,
sorry :-)
I do see what you're pointing out: the later part of the "dynamic
attribute" discussion was where the question of whether python really
needs new syntax for this was addressed, and the outcome made the
earlier discussion of "x.[y]" vs "x.(y)" vs "x.{y}" vs "x->y"
etc. irrelevant.
Ben.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
