On 2/16/07, Derek Shockey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since I was writing a script to work with potentially very large zipped
> files, I took it upon myself to write an extract() method for zipfile, which
> is essentially an adaption of the read() method modeled after tarfile's
> extract(). I feel that this is something that should really be provided in
> the zipfile module to make it more usable. I'm wondering if this has been
> discussed before, or if anyone has ever viewed this as a problem. I can post
> the code I wrote as a patch, though I'm not sure if my file IO handling is
> as robust as it needs to be for the stdlib. I'd appreciate any insight into
> the issue or direction on where I might proceed from here so as to fix what
> I see as a significant problem.

I ran into the same thing and made a patch a long while ago (the one
Martin mentioned):

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1121142&group_id=5470

I am actually working on it this weekend; if you'd like to exchange
code/test cases/whatever feel free to send me your stuff.  I'll try to
get a patch that works against the trunk posted today or tomorrow if
you want to try it out.

Cheers,
Alan
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to