[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > However, the decision was a bad one regardless of the existing policy, > and sets a bad precedent while we are discussing this policy. I could > be wrong, but I think it would be reasonable to assume that if Martin > strongly supports such a change, Martin would oppose a policy which > would strictly forbid such changes, and it is just such a policy that > Python needs.
I still can't guess what policy you have in mind, so I can't object to it :-) I may accept a policy that rejects this change, but allows another change to fix the problem. I would oppose a policy that causes this bug to be unfixable forever. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com