Guido van Rossum wrote:
> This is why I proposed to *get rid of* the distinction between > timeout=None and timeout not specified. Let an unspecified timeout > default to None, and if timeout is None, skip the settimeout() call. +1 I'll abuse of your dictatorship, and let's see if we can finally specify what I'd do: - Just put a timeout default to None. If None, skip settimeout() call. - Copy the exceptions behaviour that we have actually in the higher level libraries: maybe it's not the best, but we're sure we aren't breaking anything. - As you said in other thread when voting (a,b,c), let's make the function public (but with the more specific name: create_connection). If it's ok, I'll prepare one more update to the patch. Regards, -- . Facundo . Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
