On 4/4/07, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:07:18PM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote: > This one was at least personally addressed > (well, to "Python Contributors"), which is a step ahead of most of > them. What gets me is that such surveys are invalid because the respondents aren't randomly selected -- they're the people who care enough to answer. It would be more efficient and reliable to just go look at a sampling of project web sites and look at their bug trackers, but that requires effort from the student. Recently I was interviewing a student who worked on a project that had instrumented an IDE to record every operation (editing, saving, etc.) in a database. I asked "so what did you learn from this data?", and was told that no one has analyzed it; they're just *accumulating* the data. It's stamp collecting as computer science.
I am putting way too much effort into my PhD if this kind of stuff can get me a degree. =) -Brett
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
