On 4/7/07, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/7/07, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's a patch implementing collections.counts() as suggested above: > > The name doesn't make it obvious to me what's going on. Maybe > countunique()? Some other options are countdistinct() and > countduplicates().
-1. I like the name that Steve proposed just fine; "counts" perfectly explain that it produces counts of items. If there couldn't be duplicates then "counts" wouldn't make sense since the only outcomes would be True or False (present or not). -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
