On 5/21/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the people who have responded to my comment read too much into it. > > Nowhere do I think I asked Georg to write an equation typesetter to include > > in the Python documentation toolchain. I asked that math capability be > > considered. I have no idea what tools he used to build his new > > documentation set. I only briefly glanced at a couple of the output pages. > > I think what he has done is marvelous. However, I don't think the door > > should be shut on equation display. Is there a route to it based on the > > tools Georg is using? > > I don't think anything in the world can replace TeX for math > typesetting. So if math typesetting was a requirement (which it > should not be, for that very reason), then we could not consider > anything but TeX.
You can use docutils to generate LaTeX output from reST, and you can put raw LaTeX into the output with ".. raw:: latex". I would imagine this is sufficient for now. -bob _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
