2007/8/29, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It would have been good if you had indicated what result you had > expected instead. I assume 0; to get 0, you have to write -(3/2)+3/2, > or 0-3/2+3/2.
Wow, that caught me: >>> -3/2+3/2 -1 >>> 0-3/2+3/2 0 >>> I'm not talking about division here, just the fact that in the first case, it was (-3) / 2 and not -(3/2). It's a surprise to me, taking into account that >>> -3**2 -9 >>> 0-3**2 -9 Here, the behavior is always the same: -(3**2). Do you know why? Thanks! -- . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
