On Nov 28, 2007 10:11 PM, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Keeping __root__ relatively short has the benefit of being able to easily > use "__root__.name" in the case where "name" was/is used in the local > scope. I don't see any reason to make it harder. There might even be a > use case for using all explicit __root__ references.
Isn't this an explicit non-goal? We're talking about __builtins__, the implementation hack, not __builtin__ the module-like object you're supposed to use if you want to do things like __builtin__.open. STeVe -- I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity. --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com