> > > > > > PEP: -1 > > > tracker: +1 > > > > I agree. Then we can set some status/keyword when the subject of a RFE > > is accepted by core developers, saying "if someone proposes a patch, > > it has a chance to be reviewed and applied". > > It may incite occasional contributors to work on some of these tasks, > > confident that their work will not be thrown away in two seconds. > > My issue with keeping the RFEs in the tracker as they are is that it > artificially inflates the open issue count. Python does not have over > 1,700 open bugs. > > So I have no issue with keeping the RFEs in the tracker, at some point > I do want to change how they are represnted so that they are a > separate things from issues representing bugs and patches. > > -Brett
Sure but thats merely a tracker problem. Change your count to bugs not marked as a rfe / feature-request and you've got your real count. Tracker entries for rfes are much better than a languid document.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
