2008/3/20, Andrew McNabb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Since we officially encourage people to spawn processes instead of > threads, I think that this would be a great idea. The processing module > has a similar API to threading. It's easy to use, works well, and most > importantly, gives us some place to point people to when they complain > about the GIL.
I'm +1 to include the processing module in the stdlib. just avoid confussions, with these libraries with alike names, I'm meaning this [1] module, the one that emulates the semantics of threading module. Does anybody has strong reasons for this module to not get included? Regards, [1] http://pypi.python.org/pypi/processing -- . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
