+1 from me
On May 2, 2008, at 7:03 PM, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some people write
somename = lambda args: expression
instead of the more obvious (to most people) and, dare I say, standard
def somename(args): return expression
The difference in the result (the only one I know of) is that the
code and
function objects get the generic name '<lambda>' instead of the more
informative (in repr() output or tracebacks) 'somename'. I consider
this a
disadvantage.
In the absence of any compensating advantages (other than the trivial
saving of 3 chars), I consider the def form to be the proper Python
style
to the point I think it should be at least recommended for the
stdlib in
the Programming Recommendations section of PEP 8.
There are currently uses of named lambdas at least in urllib2. This
to me
is a bad example for new Python programmers.
What do our style mavens think?
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jnoller%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
