On May 13, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Jesse Noller wrote:
I am looking for any questions, concerns or benchmarks python-dev has
regarding the possible inclusion of the pyprocessing module to the
standard library
Sounds good, but I'd suggest giving a more specific
name than "processing", which is so generic as to
be meaningless.
--
Greg
____
Any suggestions? Subprocess is taken and concurrent might be
presumptuous unless it was added as concurrent.processing or some like
permutation.
-Jesse
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
