Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>
>> Does anybody ever complain about not being able to use isinstance on
>> twisted.application.Application? (At least it's documented as a
>> function there.)
>
> the threading "non-classes" are documented to be factory functions on
> the module page.
Given the proximity of RC1, Antoine's option 3 (leaving the capitalised
factory functions in both multiprocessing and threading APIs) is
actually sounding pretty appealing to me at the moment.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
