> ISTM, 3.0 is in pretty good shape.  There is nothing intrinsically wrong
> with it.

I think it has many bugs, some known before the release, but many more
yet to show up. I agree that the design is good; the implementation will
certainly improve (I deliberately didn't say "could have been better",
because it could not have been better, given the time available to the
contributors).

Regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to