Brett Cannon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 05:11, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Dec 7, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Christian Heimes wrote: >>> Barry Warsaw wrote: >>>> I'm personally okay with performance fixes in point releases, as long it >>>> doesn't change API or add additional features. >>> Does your okay include or exclude new internal APIs like new helper >>> functions or a new C modules? >> I /personally/ don't have a problem with that, but we need consensus before >> that becomes policy. > Internal as in just for us I am fine with, but not nothing publicly available.
Where would adding a (undocumented) get_filename() method to ZipImporter objects for the benefit of the -m switch fit then? There are a few things which don't always work properly because runpy doesn't currently know how to set __file__ properly when the module comes a zipfile. Although now that I think about it, I could actually fix that "the right way" (with a documented get_filename() method on ZipImporter) for 2.7 and 3.1, while using a runpy internal workaround specifically for ZipImporter instances in the maintenance branches... Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
