Antoine Pitrou wrote: > For the one-dimensional case, I had in mind a simple scheme where the > Py_buffer > struct has an additional two-member Py_ssize_t array. Then `shape` and > `strides` > can point to the first and second member of this array, respectively. This > wouldn't solve the multi-dimensional case, however. > > Thanks for any ideas on how to solve this.
Actually, I think your suggested scheme for the one-dimensional case shows the way forward: ownership of the shape and strides memory belongs to the object issuing the Py_buffer struct, and that object needs to deal with it when the buffer is released. Defining a larger memory chunk with the Py_buffer as the first item and the shape and stride info tacked onto the end and returning that from PyObject_GetBuffer() means that the shape/stride info will be released automatically when the view is released via PyBuffer_Release(). For more complicated cases, the object providing the views may need to do some internally bookkeeping to map from Py_buffer pointers to separately allocated shape/stride information and release those when the views are released. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com