>> If that code is the real problem (in a reproducible test case), >> then this approach is the only acceptable solution. Disabling >> long-running code is not acceptable. > > By "disabling", I meant disabling the optimization that's trying to > rearrange the arenas so that more memory can be returned to the OS.
I meant the same thing - I'm opposed to giving up one feature or optimization in favor of a different feature or optimization. > This presumably wouldn't be any worse than things were in Python 2.4, > when memory was never returned to the OS. Going back to the state of Python 2.4 would not be acceptable. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com