skip> I just stumbled upon it again.  It seems to me this would have
    skip> been a good thing to fix in 3.0.  Is this something which could
    skip> change in 3.1 (or be deprecated in 3.1 with deletion in 3.2)?

Hmmm...  I didn't really mean "deletion".  I meant, could a behavior change
be implemented in 3.2 with a warning emitted in 3.1?

Skip
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to