The sieve is just one example. The basic idea is that for some infinite generator (even a very simple one) you want to cut it off after some point. As for the number of characters, I spelled lambda incorrectly (left out a b) and there should be a space after the colon to conform to design guides. So, actually the takewhile version is two characters longer, not counting "import itertools" of course!
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Stutzbach <dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Gerald Britton <gerald.brit...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> prime = (p for p in sieve() while p < 1000) >> prime = takewhile(lamda p:p<1000, sieve()) > > I'm pretty sure the extra cost of evaluating the lambda at each step is tiny > compared to the cost of the sieve, so I don't you can make a convincing > argument on performance. > > Also, you know the latter is actually fewer characters, right? :-) > > -- > Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D. > President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
