>> Second, I think it would be good to explicitly mention the option of >> deferring this PEP. Based on previous discussion, it sounds like there >> are a fair number of people who think that there is a DVCS in Python's >> future, but not now (where "now" means over the next couple of years). > > Sure, I can add a note somewhere that says if a clear winner doesn't > come about the PEP can be revisited to a later date. >
I think the request is slightly different: consider that a potential outcome should be "svn for the next five years, then reconsider" - not because none of the DVCS is a clear winner, but because there is too much resistance to DVCSes in general, at the moment. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
