http://bugs.python.org/issue1706256
Took me a couple days to catch up on this thread so here is the link for any interested. Could it be possible to reevaluate this? On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Leif Walsh <leif.wa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Calvin Spealman <ironfro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am just replying to the end of this thread to throw in a reminder >> about my partial.skip patch, which allows the following usage: >> >> split_one = partial(str.split, partial.skip, 1) >> >> Not looking to say "mine is better", but if the idea is being given >> merit, I like the skipping arguments method better than just the >> "right partial", which I think is confusing combined with keyword and >> optional arguments. And, this patch already exists. Could it be >> re-evaluated? > > +1 but I don't know where the patch is. > > -- > Cheers, > Leif > -- Read my blog! I depend on your acceptance of my opinion! I am interesting! http://techblog.ironfroggy.com/ Follow me if you're into that sort of thing: http://www.twitter.com/ironfroggy _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
