On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <c...@hagenlocher.org> wrote: >> ...because they're not quite :). Should I file this as a bug report? > > No, this is just how it works. I hope they aren't documented as immuable?
Not that I know of :). But the individual properties of the descriptor are all read-only and that the implementations of setter, getter and deleter return new objects instead of mutating and returning the old descriptor. So it seemed a little odd that there was just one way remaining in which the object could be mutated. (I'm a recent convert to the joys of immutability. :) -- Curt Hagenlocher c...@hagenlocher.org _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
