Chris Withers wrote: > Nick Coghlan wrote: >> Network connectivity isn't a given, even today. > > Indeed, now that is an important consideration. > Packaging systems need to support "offline" modes. Buildout already does... > >> If someone else decides to create a MinimalPython which consists solely >> of something like easy_install and whatever is needed to run it (i.e. >> the opposite of the "fat" bundles from folks like ActiveState and >> Enthought), then more power to them. But I don't believe the official >> releases from python.org should go that way. > > My frustration is that some of the big standard libraries are locked to > python releases meaning they carry around bugs for longer and are harder > to contribute to than necessary... > Possibly so, but there are conflicting requirements and Python can't satisfy them all without getting more complex.
Some people want an "all batteries and kitchen sink included" distro that they can treat as a single component for configuration control purposes. Others, like you, want the libraries to be separated out to allow separate fixes. regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ Want to know? Come to PyCon - soon! http://us.pycon.org/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
