Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> writes:
> My guess was that Bazaar anchored the "centralised" end of the DVCS
> scale by letting users avoid caring about the underlying acyclic
> graph
[…]
> That makes Bazaar easy to pitch conceptually to someone like me
> ("you can use it just like you use SVN, only with much better
> merging and offline support")
[…]
> Mercurial appears to best allow the sales pitch to be tailored to
> the target audience (in this case, a group including a lot of people
> with a background predominantly involving centralised version
> control tools).
I don't follow. Wouldn't your preceding points above instead make
*Bazaar* the one best suited for a group including a lot of people
with a background predominantly involving centralised version control
tools?
--
\ “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death |
`\ your right to say it.” —Evelyn Beatrice Hall, _The Friends of |
_o__) Voltaire_, 1906 |
Ben Finney
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
