Hi, Larry Hastings wrote: > > Mark Dickinson wrote: >> >> Still, binary compatibility seems like a fairly strong reason not to >> remove the closure field. > > My understanding is that there a) 2.x extension modules are not binary > compatible with 3.x, and b) there are essentially no 3.x extension modules > in the field. Is that accurate? If we don't have an installed base (yet) > to worry about, now's the time to make this change.
cx_Oracle at least uses this closure field, and has already been ported to 3.x: http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=Connection_SetOCIAttr+trunk -- Amaury Forgeot d'Arc _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
