On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Eric Smith <e...@trueblade.com> wrote:
> I think using .network and .broadcast are pretty well understood to be the > [0] and [-1] of the network address block. I don't think we want to start > creating new terms or access patterns here. > > +1 on leaving .network and .broadcast as-is (including returning a > IPvXAddress object). > -1. I think 'network.number' or 'network.zero' is a lot clearer than 'network.network'. Maybe '.broadcast' would be okay, as long as it *can* be adjusted for those unusual, or maybe even only hypothetical, networks where it is not the [-1].
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
