Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2009/9/23 Brett Cannon <br...@python.org>:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 13:34, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> wrote:
As for burn out, I expected 2.7.x, as the last 2.x release, to be
different in that several people would do the maintenance releases
(perhaps on a 6 month schedule or so) for the 5 year period, so that
would leave me with just 3.2.x (and maybe another 3.1.x release).
Well, if you want that to happen you should make that clear now as I
expected you to do the first few micro releases of 2.7.
I will do the first few 2.7 bug fix releases.
Additionally, I'm very apprehensive about doing any kind of release
without the buildbots running. Does anyone know when they might be up?
I don't know the answer, but it might be "never". We used to do
releases without them, so it's not impossible. Just means you have to
really push the alphas, betas, and RCs.
What do you mean "push"?
Promote.
That basically means we will be relying on 3rd party libraries for our
quality control?
Isn't that the real compatibility test *anyway* - how successful a new
version of Python is at running all the existing Python code...
Michael
--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
