Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> As far as I'm concerned, anything which looks intuitive enough (e.g. 
> ini-style)
> and not overly complicated is fine. The details of the syntax aren't really
> important as long as they make sense, and don't get in the way.

One small comment before all this goes back to the distutils list: the
abbreviation "py" shouldn't be used to refer to the Python interpreter
as it is somewhat ambiguous due to the existence of the independent "py"
package [1]. The longer "python_version" has a genuine advantage in
clarity here.

Cheers,
Nick.

[1] http://codespeak.net/py/dist/index.html

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncogh...@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to