On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:04 AM, James Y Knight <f...@fuhm.net> wrote: > If that happens, it's not true that there's *nowhere* to go. A solution > would be to discard 3.x as a failed experiment, take everything that is > useful from it and port it to 2.x, and simply continue development from the > last 2.x release. And from there, features can be deprecated and then > removed a few releases later, as is the usual policy. > > Been there, done that, on a couple other projects. It's unfortunate when you > have to throw out work you've done because it failed to gain traction over > the thing you tried to replace, but sometimes that's life.
I'm not ready for that yet. I think there's plenty of time before we have to agree to such a bleak view. In the mean time let's do something practical like help NumPy port to Py3k. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
