Brett Cannon <brett <at> python.org> writes: > > I'm afraid there is some FUD going around here, which is > understandable since no one wants to burn a ton of time on something > that will be difficult or take a lot of time. But I have not heard > anyone in this email thread (or anywhere for that matter) say that > they tried a port in earnest and it turned out to be difficult.
One obvious example is the C extensions for the interpreter itself. The code for those C extensions is actually almost the same from 2.x to 3.x. The two main changes are the module initialization sequence (see PEP 3121) and the bytes->unicode change for special methods such as tp_repr. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
