Terry Reedy wrote: > A nice demonstration of what an excellent piece of work the new .format > is or is becoming. I would still like it to be a goal for 3.2 that all > stdlib modules that work with formats accept the new formats and not > just % formats. > > Mark Summerfield only covered .format in his book on Python 3 programimg > and I hated to tell him that there was at least one module in the stdlib > that currently (3.1) requires the old style.
Yes, we do need to do that. It would be nice if we could come up with a cleaner solution than a proliferation of parallel APIs everywhere though :( Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com