On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 14:13, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote:
> [...]
> >> 'nt': {
> >> 'stdlib': '$base/Lib',
> >> 'platstdlib': '$base/Lib',
> >> 'purelib': '$base/Lib/site-packages',
> >> 'platlib': '$base/Lib/site-packages',
> >> 'include': '$base/include',
> >> 'platinclude': '$base/include',
> >> 'scripts': '$base/Scripts',
> >> 'data' : '$base',
> >> },
> >> ...
> >> }
> >>
> >
> > Are you using string.Template because this code needs to run on installs
> > older than 2.6?
> > -Brett
>
> Not really. That's mostly because I reused the existing implementation
> and I found them quite readable in that case. But a string.Formatter
> could work well here too I guess.
Just figured that with formatters the way of the future that
"{base}/include" would work just as well and be "future-proof".
-Brett
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
