On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: > David Lyon wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:31:09 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull" >> <step...@xemacs.org> wrote: >> >>> Martin's point is that the PEP process doesn't *have* "reference" >>> implementations. It has *sample* implementations. It may be useful >>> to refer to a sample implementation as an example.. >> >> Fair enough. But otoh, asking for sample implementations on this >> type of project can skew the PEP towards a particular implementation >> or product. > > Nobody is "asking" for sample implementations. Instead, I'm asking that > what Tarek calls a "reference implementation" should be called a > "sample implementation" instead. I'm asking for that precisely to avoid > a skew towards a particular implementation.
I'll remove it and push it in Distutils documentation, then might just provide a link in the PEP References. Tarek _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
