On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 11:34 -0800, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Collin Winter <collinwin...@google.com> > wrote: > > We absolutely do not want CPython to include a copy of LLVM in its > > source tree. Unladen Swallow has done this to make it easier to pick > > up changes to LLVM's codebase as we make them, but this is not a > > viable model for CPython's long-term development. As mentioned in > > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3146/#managing-llvm-releases-c-api-changes, > > one of our full-time engineers is tasked with fixing all critical > > issues in LLVM before LLVM's 2.7 release so that CPython can simply > > use that release. > > I'm now tracking my to-do list for LLVM 2.7 in > http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/issues/detail?id=131.
Many thanks for addressing these concerns! Dave _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
