On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Mark Dickinson <[email protected]> wrote: > and particularly the discussion on page 8 that starts "Were there no > way to get rid of NaNs ...". I don't think it covers hypot, but the
Whoops. I should have reread that article myself. The behaviour of hypot *is* mentioned, on page 7. Mark _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
