On Mar 3, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Greg Ewing wrote: > Glenn Linderman wrote: > >> In this scenario, the .pyc files would still live in __pycache__ ? Complete >> with the foo.<token>.pyc naming ? > > It might be neater to have a separate cache directory > for each bytecode version, named __cache.<token>__ or > some such.
Okay, this is probably some pretty silly bikeshedding, but: if we're going to have it be something.something-else, can we please make sure that .something-else is a common extension that means "python bytecode cache"? It would be good to keep the file-manager and shell operations required to say "blow away bytecode cache directories" as simple as possible. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
