On 3/6/2010 4:20 AM, Brian Quinlan wrote:
On 6 Mar 2010, at 03:21, Daniel Stutzbach wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Brian Quinlan <br...@sweetapp.com
<mailto:br...@sweetapp.com>> wrote:
import futures
+1 on the idea, -1 on the name. It's too similar to "from __future__
import ...".
Also, the PEP should probably link to the discussions on stdlib-sig?
I thoug ht about that but this discussion is spread over many threads
and many months.
This is pretty typical. I would say just that, and link to the first.
"This PEP was discussed over many months in many threads in the
stdlib-sig list. The first was .... . Python-dev discussion occured in
<this thread>.
tjr
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com