On 20/03/2010 00:19, Glenn Linderman wrote:
On 3/19/2010 5:18 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
will probably get you buggy results, somehow or another. That's what
> design, code reviews, and testing are for.
We'll have to "agree to disagree" then. If you want error silencing
by default,
Python is not the language you are looking for.
We can agree to disagree, if you like. But taken to the limit, the
Zen you quoted would prevent the try except clause from being used.
No, that is what "unless explicitly silenced" means - you are
proposing to silence them *without* an explicit try except clause.
Michael
Who, me? The containment checking code would contain the try/except,
I was proposing.
Explicit by the programmer. That is what explicit means... Caught and
silenced for you by Python is implicit.
Michael
Glenn
--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
READ CAREFULLY. By accepting and reading this email you agree, on behalf of
your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any
and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap,
clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and
acceptable use policies (”BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your
employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without
prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you
have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your
employer.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
