On Mar 22, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Raymond Hettinger > <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> >> Decimal + float --> Decimal >> >> If everybody associated with the Decimal implementation wants this I >> won't stop you; as I repeatedly said my intuition about this one (as >> opposed to the other two above) is very weak. >> >> That's my vote. >> I believe Nick chimed-in in agreement. >> Mark, do you concur? > > Yes; Decimal + float -> Decimal works for me; the greater flexibility > of the Decimal type is the main plus for me.
> On Mar 22, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > >> I've been lurking on this thread so far, but let me add my +1 to this >> option. On Mar 22, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> > > Thanks, "better" is a great way to express this. OMG ;-) It looks like there is a consensus on: Decimal + float --> Decimal We have progress. Raymond
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
