On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <amaur...@gmail.com> wrote: > I noticed that the newly added argparse module has an unusual > licence header, included below. This is the only file in the Python tree > that contains an explicit reference to the Apache License, > and this leads me to some questions:
Sorry, I forgot to remove this when moving argparse to the stdlib. There's probably one test\test_argparse too. > - Did the contributor sign a Contributor agreement? In this case, > shouldn't the code be marked as "Licensed to PSF under a Contributor > Agreement", > as mentioned in the contribution form? > http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form > And then, could this Apache License be removed? Yes, I have signed a contributor agreement. I was thinking of just removing the license entirely, but if it's better to replace it with "Licensed to PSF under a Contributor Agreement", that's fine too. Let me know, and I'll take care of this today. Thanks for catching this! Steve -- Where did you get that preposterous hypothesis? Did Steve tell you that? --- The Hiphopopotamus _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
