2010/4/25 <s...@pobox.com>: > > >> Given that Sean is vouching for him I'm fine with it. > > Antoine> I'm not sure I agree. Of course it could be argued the risk is > Antoine> minimal, but I think it's better if all people go through the > Antoine> same path of proving their motivation and quality of work. And > Antoine> if there's something wrong with that process we'd better > Antoine> address it than give random privileges to people we like :) > > Let me expand on my original message. Sean has been an integral part of the > Python community for many years, keeping much of our hardware and software > humming and providing critical network expertise at PyCon. I don't think we > have to be such slaves to a set of rules that we can't use an implicit trust > network to make decisions in certain cases. I trust Sean's judgement.
I don't think Antoine is questioning Sean's judgement but rather that we should get into the habit of giving some people "shortcuts" through the regular process. -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
